Inuit TraditionCreature
Tupilaq

- made and animated for revenge
- can be turned against its maker by a stronger angakkuq
- takes animal form, often a seal
In Greenlandic tradition, a being secretly made from animal parts and sometimes human remains and brought to life to harm an enemy; it could be turned back against its maker. Carved tupilaq figures are now a Greenlandic art form.
About Tupilaq
A made thing
In Greenlandic belief, a tupilaq (plural tupilait) was a being made in secret, from parts of different animals and sometimes human remains, and brought to life with songs and rituals in order to harm an enemy. It was set loose in the sea, often in the form of a seal, to find and kill its victim. Making one was dangerous: if the intended victim had a stronger angakkuq, the tupilaq could be turned back to destroy the one who made it.
From belief to carving
The original tupilait were not meant to be seen, and none survive. When Europeans in East Greenland in the late nineteenth century asked what a tupilaq looked like, Greenlandic carvers made small figures to show them, and from these a whole art form grew. Today tupilaq figures carved from bone, antler, narwhal and walrus tusk, and soapstone are among the best-known Greenlandic artworks, often grotesque composites of human and animal features.
Sources
Descriptions of tupilait come mainly from Greenlandic tellings recorded by Hinrich Rink and later Danish ethnographers, and from the Tasiilaq (Ammassalik) region of East Greenland. The practice described belongs to the past; the carvings are a living art.
Sources and further reading
Source notes
These references are recorded in the catalog. Their passage wording and translation have not been checked, so quotations are not displayed here.
- Hinrich Rink, Tales and Traditions of the Eskimo
About this entry
By Elizabeth Stein for Mythos Atlas. About the author. Editorial notes are grounded in the site's cited sources and can be challenged through the contact page.
The danger rating is an editorial shorthand for how the myths portray the creature, not a claim made by the sources.