Skip to main content
Mythos Atlas

Source recordAncient text

The Baal Cycle (KTU 1.1-1.6)

Anonymous Ugaritic poet(s); tablets copied by the scribe Ilimilku · Tablets of the late 13th or early 12th c. BCE; the poem is older · Ugaritic

Ancient text

The Baal Cycle (KTU 1.1-1.6)

Anonymous Ugaritic poet(s); tablets copied by the scribe Ilimilku

Tablets of the late 13th or early 12th c. BCE; the poem is older

Six damaged tablets from Ugarit telling how the storm-god Baal defeats Yamm (the Sea), wins permission to build his palace on Mount Zaphon, descends into the throat of Mot (Death), and returns to life. The order of the first tablets and many passages are uncertain.

About this work

Six damaged tablets from Ugarit telling how the storm-god Baal defeats Yamm (the Sea), wins permission to build his palace on Mount Zaphon, descends into the throat of Mot (Death), and returns to life. The order of the first tablets and many passages are uncertain.

Where to start

Read tablets 1.1-1.2 (Baal and Yamm), then 1.3-1.4 (the palace), then 1.5-1.6 (Baal and Mot). Mark S. Smith's translations mark gaps and uncertain readings clearly.

Figures in the text

Heroes and divinities who feature prominently, with where they appear.

Key scenes

Turning points of the work, in reading order.

  1. Yagrush and Ayyamur

    KTU 1.2 IV

    Kothar-wa-Khasis makes two named clubs for Baal; the second strikes Yamm on the head and he falls.

  2. The Window in the Palace

    KTU 1.4 V-VII

    Baal at first refuses a window in his new palace, then allows it; through the rift in the clouds he thunders.

  3. Anat Destroys Mot

    KTU 1.6 II

    Anat seizes Mot, splits him with a blade, winnows, burns, grinds, and sows him like grain.

  4. Baal Lives

    KTU 1.6 III

    El dreams that the heavens rain oil and the wadis run with honey, and knows that Baal is alive.

Stories drawn from it

Retellings in the atlas that quote or cite this work.

About this record

By Elizabeth Stein for Mythos Atlas. . Editorial notes are grounded in the site's cited sources and can be challenged through the contact page.

Dates and authorship follow standard scholarly references; for many ancient works both are approximate or disputed.